All submitted manuscripts to the 2026 International Conference on Advanced Energy, Environment and Materials (ICAEEM 26) will undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, and relevance of the research presented at the conference.
Review Process
Each submitted paper will be reviewed by members of the Technical Program Committee or external expert reviewers in the relevant research area. The review process aims to maintain high academic standards and ensure that only high-quality research contributions are accepted for presentation. The review process typically includes the following steps:
Initial Screening Submitted papers are first checked by the conference editorial team to ensure that they meet the basic formatting requirements and fall within the scope of the conference.
Peer Review Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the related field.
Reviewer Evaluation Reviewers assess submissions based on several criteria, including:
Originality and novelty of the research
Technical quality and methodology
Relevance to the conference themes
Clarity of presentation
Contribution to the field
Final Decision Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the Program Committee will make the final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of the paper.
Review Model
ICAEEM 26 follows a single-blind peer-review process, where the identities of the reviewers are kept confidential, while the authors’ identities are known to the reviewers.
Ethical Standards
All submissions must represent original work that has not been previously published or simultaneously submitted to another conference or journal. The conference follows general academic ethical standards regarding:
plagiarism
data integrity
proper citation of sources
Submissions that violate ethical guidelines may be rejected at any stage of the review process.
Confidentiality
All submitted manuscripts will be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers are required to maintain confidentiality and may not share or use the content of submitted papers for personal advantage.
Important Note
The decisions of the Program Committee and reviewers are final.